JOHSON v. HOLDER, 4:11-cv-2650-RBH-KDW. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20120716c30
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER KAYMANI D. WEST, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Mediation, ECF No. 35. In that motion, Plaintiff informs the court that the parties conducted a pre-mediation discussion and concluded that mediation prior to the court's ruling on Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss would not be a prudent use of resources. Plaintiff further advises the court that Defendant consents to the Motion for Relief from Mediation. For good cause shown, the
Summary: ORDER KAYMANI D. WEST, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Mediation, ECF No. 35. In that motion, Plaintiff informs the court that the parties conducted a pre-mediation discussion and concluded that mediation prior to the court's ruling on Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss would not be a prudent use of resources. Plaintiff further advises the court that Defendant consents to the Motion for Relief from Mediation. For good cause shown, the ..
More
ORDER
KAYMANI D. WEST, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Mediation, ECF No. 35. In that motion, Plaintiff informs the court that the parties conducted a pre-mediation discussion and concluded that mediation prior to the court's ruling on Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss would not be a prudent use of resources. Plaintiff further advises the court that Defendant consents to the Motion for Relief from Mediation.
For good cause shown, the court GRANTS the Motion for Relief from Mediation, ECF No. 35. The parties are advised, however, that they are not excused from being required to mediate at a later date. Any scheduling order entered subsequent to the court's ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss will include a revised mediation deadline.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
