U.S. v. PEREZ-LAGUNA, 3:07-468-CMC. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20120730812
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2012
Summary: OPINION and ORDER CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion for reduction of sentence "pursuant to the Fast Track Directive" and 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). ECF No. 358. The Government has responded, contending that the court is without jurisdiction to act upon Defendant's motion. ECF No. 361. For the reasons stated by the Government, with which this court agrees, the court is without jurisdiction to entertain Defendant's motion. Accordingly, De
Summary: OPINION and ORDER CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion for reduction of sentence "pursuant to the Fast Track Directive" and 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). ECF No. 358. The Government has responded, contending that the court is without jurisdiction to act upon Defendant's motion. ECF No. 361. For the reasons stated by the Government, with which this court agrees, the court is without jurisdiction to entertain Defendant's motion. Accordingly, Def..
More
OPINION and ORDER
CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion for reduction of sentence "pursuant to the Fast Track Directive" and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). ECF No. 358. The Government has responded, contending that the court is without jurisdiction to act upon Defendant's motion. ECF No. 361.
For the reasons stated by the Government, with which this court agrees, the court is without jurisdiction to entertain Defendant's motion. Accordingly, Defendant's motion is dismissed without prejudice as this court is without jurisdiction to consider it.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
