Filed: Jun. 14, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2013
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, District Judge. The above referenced case is before this court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that the action be dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution, and that any pending motions be terminated. This court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, District Judge. The above referenced case is before this court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that the action be dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution, and that any pending motions be terminated. This court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 ..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. NORTON, District Judge.
The above referenced case is before this court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that the action be dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution, and that any pending motions be terminated.
This court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written objections to the magistrate judge's report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984).1 No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.
A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is AFFIRMED, and the action is DISMISSED with prejudice lack of prosecution.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any pending motions are terminated.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
