FRAZIER v. PALMETTO HomeSTYLE, LLC, 3:13-2780-JFA. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20141028928
Filed: Oct. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge. This court previously established a deadline by which the defendant must notify the court of new counsel in this action. Defendants have filed documents with the court indicating that they are making a sincere attempt to obtain new counsel and that there is a possibility that insurance coverage may be available which would provide for defense costs. For these reasons, the deadline by which the defendants must notify the court of the identity of t
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge. This court previously established a deadline by which the defendant must notify the court of new counsel in this action. Defendants have filed documents with the court indicating that they are making a sincere attempt to obtain new counsel and that there is a possibility that insurance coverage may be available which would provide for defense costs. For these reasons, the deadline by which the defendants must notify the court of the identity of th..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.
This court previously established a deadline by which the defendant must notify the court of new counsel in this action. Defendants have filed documents with the court indicating that they are making a sincere attempt to obtain new counsel and that there is a possibility that insurance coverage may be available which would provide for defense costs.
For these reasons, the deadline by which the defendants must notify the court of the identity of the their new counsel is hereby extended until December 2, 2014.
No further extensions will be granted. Defendants are reminded that under existing law, a corporation may not be represented in court by its stockholders or officers, if they are not attorneys. For this reason, if new counsel is not obtained by December 1, 2014, the defendant corporation will be in default. The remaining individual defendants may proceed to represent themselves on a pro se basis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
