Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MAYS v. COLVIN, 8:14-cv-00371-JMC. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20151104b09 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER J. MICHELLE CHILDS , District Judge . This matter is before the court upon motion of Plaintiff, through her attorney, Paul McChesney, for an award of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") and costs, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d). (ECF Nos. 30, 30-6.) Plaintiff's original motion, filed on August 16, 2015, sought reimbursement for her counsel's representation in the captioned matter in the amount of $4,226.36 in attorney's fees. ( Id. ) In a Joint Stipulation, filed on Sep
More

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon motion of Plaintiff, through her attorney, Paul McChesney, for an award of attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") and costs, 28 U.S.C.§ 2412(d). (ECF Nos. 30, 30-6.) Plaintiff's original motion, filed on August 16, 2015, sought reimbursement for her counsel's representation in the captioned matter in the amount of $4,226.36 in attorney's fees. (Id.) In a Joint Stipulation, filed on September 2, 2015, the parties agreed to stipulate that Plaintiff instead be awarded $4,026.36 in attorney's fees. (ECF No. 31 at 1.)

The court has reviewed Plaintiff's counsel's original fee petition (ECF Nos. 30, 30-6) and the Joint Stipulation (ECF No. 31 at 1) and finds that Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney's fees under the EAJA in the amount of $4,026.36. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(c)(1), 2414; Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302-03 (1993). In accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this court belong to the litigant, thus subjecting EAJA fees to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)) and, therefore, the court directs that fees be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees (ECF Nos. 30, 30-6) therefore is GRANTED, as amended by the Joint Stipulation (ECF No. 31).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer