DANIELS v. ASCO NUMATICS, 1:15-4371-JMC-PJG. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20160325j37
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER PAIGE J. GOSSETT , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, filed this matter alleging violations of her civil rights by the named defendant. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss on March 4, 2016, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 6.) As of the date of this order, the plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7.06 (D.S.C.). As such, it appears to the court that she does not oppose the motion and wi
Summary: ORDER PAIGE J. GOSSETT , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, filed this matter alleging violations of her civil rights by the named defendant. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss on March 4, 2016, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 6.) As of the date of this order, the plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7.06 (D.S.C.). As such, it appears to the court that she does not oppose the motion and wis..
More
ORDER
PAIGE J. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, filed this matter alleging violations of her civil rights by the named defendant. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss on March 4, 2016, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 6.) As of the date of this order, the plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7.06 (D.S.C.). As such, it appears to the court that she does not oppose the motion and wishes to abandon this action.
Based on the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the plaintiff shall advise the court as to whether she wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to the defendant's motion to dismiss within seven (7) days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is further advised that if she fails to respond, this action may be decided on the record presented in support of the defendant's motion, see Local Civil Rule 7.06 (D.S.C.), or may be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th Cir. 1978); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
