Dominion Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC v. 24.346 Acres, Case Number 3:16-cv-01973-JMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20171201e43
Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING THE CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND THE STAY OF SCHEDULING ORDER J. MICHELLE CHILDS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Parties' Consent Motion to Extend the Stay of the Scheduling Order originally ordered on June 13, 2017 (Dkt. No. 45). Specifically, the Parties request the Court to extend the stay of the scheduling order pending a jurisdictional determination on the application of the landowner by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as to the subject property.
Summary: ORDER GRANTING THE CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND THE STAY OF SCHEDULING ORDER J. MICHELLE CHILDS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Parties' Consent Motion to Extend the Stay of the Scheduling Order originally ordered on June 13, 2017 (Dkt. No. 45). Specifically, the Parties request the Court to extend the stay of the scheduling order pending a jurisdictional determination on the application of the landowner by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as to the subject property. H..
More
ORDER GRANTING THE CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND THE STAY OF SCHEDULING ORDER
J. MICHELLE CHILDS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Parties' Consent Motion to Extend the Stay of the Scheduling Order originally ordered on June 13, 2017 (Dkt. No. 45). Specifically, the Parties request the Court to extend the stay of the scheduling order pending a jurisdictional determination on the application of the landowner by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as to the subject property. Having reviewed the motion, applicable law, and the record herein, the Court finds that good cause exists to extend the stay of the scheduling order until said determination is made, or such time, if any, upon motion by either party.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Parties' Consent Motion to Extend the Stay of Scheduling Order is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Parties shall confer every thirty (30) days to have a status update on whether the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has made the requested jurisdictional determination and shall provide periodic updates to the Court as deemed necessary. It is further ORDERED that the Parties shall conduct a scheduling conference within thirty (30) days after the expiration of the stay to reset the deadlines set forth in the scheduling order, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
