Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Marshall, 3:06-562 (CMC). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20180206f22
Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion for Reduction of Sentence under Guidelines Amendment 782. ECF No. 85. The Government has responded in opposition to the motion based upon Defendant's disciplinary record inside the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). ECF No. 86. In considering a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), the court "may reduce the term of imprisonment after considering the factors set forth in section
More

ORDER

This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion for Reduction of Sentence under Guidelines Amendment 782. ECF No. 85. The Government has responded in opposition to the motion based upon Defendant's disciplinary record inside the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). ECF No. 86.

In considering a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), the court "may reduce the term of imprisonment after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent they are applicable . . . ." 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Section 3553(a) of Title 18 provides:

The court, in determining the particular sentence to be imposed, shall consider— (1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant; (2) the need for the sentence imposed— (A) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense; (B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct; (C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and (D) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner .. . .

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

On April 25, 2007, Defendant appeared before this court for sentencing. The court sentenced Defendant to 168 months' imprisonment, to be followed by eight years' supervised release. On May 5, 2010, Defendant's sentence was reduced to 140 months' imprisonment based upon Amendment 706 to the Guidelines.

During his incarceration, Defendant has been convicted of a variety of infractions evidencing a failure to abide by and respect institutional authority and rules. For example, on April 13, 2013, Defendant was sanctioned for possessing drugs/alcohol. Additionally, Defendant has refused to obey orders and a work/program assignment.

After considering Defendant's actions while incarcerated and applying the relevant abovenoted factors from 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the court finds that a reduction of sentence under Amendment 782 is not warranted. Defendant continues to exhibit a lack of respect for the law, is not deterred in his unlawful behavior, and — absent significant change in behavior — will continue to be a danger to the public if released prior to completion of the sentence currently imposed.

Defendant's motion for relief under Amendment 782 is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer