Inabinett v. Berryhill, 6:17-CV-03307-TMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20180730e84
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY M. CAIN , District Judge . Upon consideration of the record, including Defendant's Motion to Remand, it is hereby ordered that Defendant's Motion for Remand (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. Counsel for Defendant has consulted Plaintiff's counsel regarding this motion and states that Plaintiff consents to the remand of this action. (ECF No. 17 at 2). Pursuant to the power of this court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in So
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY M. CAIN , District Judge . Upon consideration of the record, including Defendant's Motion to Remand, it is hereby ordered that Defendant's Motion for Remand (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. Counsel for Defendant has consulted Plaintiff's counsel regarding this motion and states that Plaintiff consents to the remand of this action. (ECF No. 17 at 2). Pursuant to the power of this court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Soc..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY M. CAIN, District Judge.
Upon consideration of the record, including Defendant's Motion to Remand, it is hereby ordered that Defendant's Motion for Remand (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. Counsel for Defendant has consulted Plaintiff's counsel regarding this motion and states that Plaintiff consents to the remand of this action. (ECF No. 17 at 2). Pursuant to the power of this court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner's request for a remand of this action for further proceedings, the Commissioner's decision is hereby REVERSED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The case shall be REMANDED to the administrative law judge for further proceedings, where the administrative law judge will hold a new hearing and issue a new decision that fully considers the opinion of Michael Neboschick, M.D. and includes a function-by-function assessment of the claimant's work-related mental limitations.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
