Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rhamis v. Berryhill, 5:18-cv-01644-JMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20190118c12 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER J. MICHELLE CHILDS , District Judge . This matter is before the court pursuant to the Commissioner's unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Order of Remand. (ECF No. 9.) The Commissioner asserts that remand is appropriate because "further administrative action is warranted in this case." ( Id. at 1.) Therefore, based upon the reasons asserted by the Commissioner in her Motion, the court hereby GRANTS the Motion to Remand. Accordingly, pursuant to the power of this court to ent
More

ORDER

This matter is before the court pursuant to the Commissioner's unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Order of Remand. (ECF No. 9.) The Commissioner asserts that remand is appropriate because "further administrative action is warranted in this case." (Id. at 1.) Therefore, based upon the reasons asserted by the Commissioner in her Motion, the court hereby GRANTS the Motion to Remand. Accordingly, pursuant to the power of this court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner's request for remand of this action for further proceedings, this court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer