Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lawer v. Berryhill, 1: 16-3739-RMG. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20190211d66 Visitors: 21
Filed: Feb. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER RICHARD MARK GERGEL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for approval of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. 406(b). (Dkt. No. 28). Plaintiff seeks approval of an attorney's fee for his services on behalf of Plaintiff in federal court in the amount of $11,934.00, which represents 25% of the total back award obtained on behalf of Plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 28-1). Plaintiffs contract with his counsel provides for a 25% contingency fee. The Defendant has adv
More

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for approval of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Dkt. No. 28). Plaintiff seeks approval of an attorney's fee for his services on behalf of Plaintiff in federal court in the amount of $11,934.00, which represents 25% of the total back award obtained on behalf of Plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 28-1). Plaintiffs contract with his counsel provides for a 25% contingency fee. The Defendant has advised the Court that she does not oppose approval of the attorney fee request of Plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 29).

The Court has reviewed the Plaintiffs motion in light of the standards set forth in Grisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002). The Court finds that pursuant to the Grisbrecht standards the proposed fee is reasonable and grants the Plaintiffs motion to approve the fee in the amount of $11,934.00.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer