Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Arnett v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc., 0:17-cv-02201-JMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. South Carolina Number: infdco20190806e02 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING CONSENT MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE J. MICHELLE CHILDS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Parties' Consent Motion to Consolidate, whereby the Parties request that this action be consolidated with the already-consolidated actions pending before this Court, styled Pennington et al. v. Fluor Corp. et al., C/A No. 0:17-02094-JMC ("Pennington Action") and Butler et al. v. Fluor Corp. et al., C/A No. 0:17-02201-JMC ("Butler Action"). Having read and carefully
More

ORDER GRANTING CONSENT MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

This matter is before the Court on the Parties' Consent Motion to Consolidate, whereby the Parties request that this action be consolidated with the already-consolidated actions pending before this Court, styled Pennington et al. v. Fluor Corp. et al., C/A No. 0:17-02094-JMC ("Pennington Action") and Butler et al. v. Fluor Corp. et al., C/A No. 0:17-02201-JMC ("Butler Action"). Having read and carefully considered the Consent Motion to Consolidate, the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties' Consent Motion to Consolidate and consolidates these proceedings with the Pennington Action and the Butler Action for purposes of discovery and pretrial motions.1 All relevant filings and submissions shall be made in all three case numbers from this point forward.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. At the close of discovery, and after the court has issued an opinion on any dispositive motion filed, the court will decide to what extent, if at all, the trial of these three cases shall proceed together.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer