TERRY L. WOOTEN, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, passed by Congress and signed into law by the President on December 21, 2018. Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194. This law contains sentencing provisions that apply retroactively to certain defendants previously sentenced.
Defendant pled guilty to a charge of Conspiracy to Possess With Intent to Distribute 50 Grams or More of Cocaine Base, 5 Kilograms or More of Cocaine, and 1 Kilogram or More of Heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. After taking into account the § 851 Information that the Government previously filed, his statutory sentencing range was 20 years to Life, followed by at least 10 years of supervised release. PSR ¶¶ 100, 104. His Guidelines range at sentencing was 292-365 months (37/IV), followed by 10 years of supervised release.
Defendant was released from custody on December 4, 2015 to begin serving his 10-year term of supervised release. On December 19, 2017, his supervised release was revoked, and he was sentenced to 36 months imprisonment with no supervised release to follow. ECF No. 289.
Section 404(b) of the First Step Act provides that "[a] court that imposed a sentence for a covered offense may . . . impose a reduced sentence as if sections 2 and 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 . . . were in effect at the time the covered offense was committed." Section 404(a) defines "covered offense" as "a violation of a Federal criminal statute, the statutory penalties for which were modified by section 2 or 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 . . ., that was committed before August 3, 2010." The Court concludes that Defendant is not eligible for relief because he was charged with and pled guilty to the § 841(b)(1)(A) threshold amounts of crack, cocaine, and heroin, and the Fair Sentencing Act did not reduce the statutory penalties applicable to either cocaine or heroin. Thus, his statutory sentencing range would have been the same if the Fair Sentencing Act had been in place when he committed the offense of conviction.
Furthermore, § 404(c) of the First Step Act explicitly provides that "[n]othing in this section shall be construed to require a court to reduce any sentence pursuant to this section." Even if Defendant were eligible for a sentence reduction, the Court would exercise its discretion to not reduce his sentence for several reasons, including (1) he was held accountable at sentencing for a crack weight (12.6 kilograms) that would have easily supported a charge to the current threshold amount (280 grams);
For these reasons, Defendant's motion, ECF No. 310, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.