Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

D'Utricht v. Melchor, (1789)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number:  Visitors: 5
Judges: Now
Filed: Jan. 01, 1789
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 1 U.S. 428 (1789) 1 Dall. 428 D'UTRICHT versus MELCHOR. Supreme Court of United States. *429 The case being held for some days under advisement, the CHIEF JUSTICE now delivered the opinion of the Court to the following effect: M`KEAN, Chief Justice. It is unnecessary at this time to determine, whether the Plaintiff might have instituted an action of covenant, or deceit, in order to obtain a redress of the wrong which he has sustained; for, we think it is sufficient for his purpose, that an actio
More
1 U.S. 428 (1789)
1 Dall. 428

D'UTRICHT
versus
MELCHOR.

Supreme Court of United States.

*429 The case being held for some days under advisement, the CHIEF JUSTICE now delivered the opinion of the Court to the following effect:

M`KEAN, Chief Justice.

It is unnecessary at this time to determine, whether the Plaintiff might have instituted an action of covenant, or deceit, in order to obtain a redress of the wrong which he has sustained; for, we think it is sufficient for his purpose, that an action of Assumpsit for money had and received to his use, has been brought; and that, to maintain this action, he may give in evidence, that the Defendant got his money by mistake, imposition, or deceit. To prove the alledged mistake, imposition, or deceit, *430 deeds or other writings, which are not the immediate foundation of the suit, but only leading to it, may be read.

We are all, therefore, of opinion, that a new trial ought not to be granted.

Judgment for the Plaintiff.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer