United States v. Caldwell, (1795)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number:
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 01, 1795
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2017
Summary: 2 U.S. 333 (_) 2 Dall. 333 THE UNITED STATES versus CALDWELL. Supreme Court of United States. *334 Rawle, the District Attorney, objected. BY THE COURT: We have no hesitation in granting the indulgence of a delay for a few days. The cause may, therefore, be continued 'till this day week; and, in the meantime, let the attachment issue; but it can only be in the case, in which the subp na has been actually served. The practice must always *335 be strict in the previous stages of the business, be
Summary: 2 U.S. 333 (_) 2 Dall. 333 THE UNITED STATES versus CALDWELL. Supreme Court of United States. *334 Rawle, the District Attorney, objected. BY THE COURT: We have no hesitation in granting the indulgence of a delay for a few days. The cause may, therefore, be continued 'till this day week; and, in the meantime, let the attachment issue; but it can only be in the case, in which the subp na has been actually served. The practice must always *335 be strict in the previous stages of the business, bef..
More
2 U.S. 333 (____)
2 Dall. 333
THE UNITED STATES
versus
CALDWELL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Rawle, the District Attorney, objected.
BY THE COURT: We have no hesitation in granting the indulgence of a delay for a few days. The cause may, therefore, be continued 'till this day week; and, in the meantime, let the attachment issue; but it can only be in the case, in which the subpna has been actually served. The practice must always be strict in the previous stages of the business, before an attachment can be awarded; and all the documents, upon which it is awarded, must be filed with the Court.
Source: CourtListener
