Hollingsworth v. Adams, (1798)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number:
Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 01, 1798
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2017
Summary: 2 U.S. 396 (_) 2 Dall. 396 HOLLINGSWORTH versus ADAMS. Supreme Court of United States. Thomas and Hallowell, on behalf of the plaintiff, wished for time to enquire into the practice; but not being able on the next day to assign any satisfactory reason in maintenance of the action. THE COURT directed the writ to be quashed with costs.
2 U.S. 396 (____)
2 Dall. 396
HOLLINGSWORTH
versus
ADAMS.
Supreme Court of United States.
Thomas and Hallowell, on behalf of the plaintiff, wished for time to enquire into the practice; but not being able on the next day to assign any satisfactory reason in maintenance of the action.
THE COURT directed the writ to be quashed with costs.
Source: CourtListener
