Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Breckbill v. Turnpike Company, (1799)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number:  Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 01, 1799
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 3 U.S. 496 (_) 3 Dall. 496 BRECKBILL versus TURNPIKE COMPANY. Supreme Court of United States. *500 E. Tilghman and Hopkins, for the Plaintiff. Lewis, Ingersoll, M`Kean and C. Smith, for the Defendants. THE COURT, on the day succeeding the argument, delivered an unanimous opinion, that on this special verdict, the Plaintiff could not recover, in the present form of action, against the Defendants, as a corporation: And, therefore, they deemed it unnecessary to decide the other questions in the cau
More
3 U.S. 496 (____)
3 Dall. 496

BRECKBILL
versus
TURNPIKE COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

*500 E. Tilghman and Hopkins, for the Plaintiff.

Lewis, Ingersoll, M`Kean and C. Smith, for the Defendants.

THE COURT, on the day succeeding the argument, delivered an unanimous opinion, that on this special verdict, the Plaintiff could not recover, in the present form of action, against the Defendants, as a corporation: And, therefore, they deemed it unnecessary to decide the other questions in the cause.

Judgment for the Defendants.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer