Williamson v. Kincaid, (1800)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number:
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 01, 1800
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 4 U.S. 20 (_) 4 Dall. 20 Williamson, Plaintiff in Error, versus Kincaid. Supreme Court of United States. *21 Ingersoll and Dallas, for the plaintiff in error. E. Tilghman, for the defendant in error. By the COURT: Be it so. Let the value of the matter in dispute be ascertained by affidavits, to be taken on ten days notice to the demandant, or her counsel in Georgia. But, consequently, the writ of error is not to be a supersedeas.
4 U.S. 20 (____)
4 Dall. 20
Williamson, Plaintiff in Error,
versus
Kincaid.
Supreme Court of United States.
Ingersoll and Dallas, for the plaintiff in error.
E. Tilghman, for the defendant in error.
By the COURT:
Be it so. Let the value of the matter in dispute be ascertained by affidavits, to be taken on ten days notice to the demandant, or her counsel in Georgia. But, consequently, the writ of error is not to be a supersedeas.
Source: CourtListener
