Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rodford v. Craig, (1809)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number:  Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 15, 1809
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 9 U.S. 289 (1809) 5 Cranch 289 RODFORD v. CRAIG. Supreme Court of United States. NO appearance having been entered on the docket for either party in this cause, no counsel appearing, the court ordered both parties to be called, and neither of them appearing, the court ordered the writ of error to be dismissed. The same order was made in the cases of Banks v. Bastrop, Tompkins v. Tompkins, and Buchannan v. Yeates.
9 U.S. 289 (1809)
5 Cranch 289

RODFORD
v.
CRAIG.

Supreme Court of United States.

NO appearance having been entered on the docket for either party in this cause, no counsel appearing, the court ordered both parties to be called, and neither of them appearing, the court ordered the writ of error to be dismissed.

The same order was made in the cases of Banks v. Bastrop, Tompkins v. Tompkins, and Buchannan v. Yeates.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer