Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, in Error v. Aaron Ross, Who Sues for the Use of Robert Patterson, (1850)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number:  Visitors: 8
Filed: May 20, 1850
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 50 U.S. 602 9 How. 602 13 L. Ed. 276 SMITH HOGAN, ARTHUR S. HOGAN, AND RICHARD Y. REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. AARON ROSS, WHO SUES FOR THE USE OF ROBERT PATTERSON. January Term, 1850 1 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi. 2 The order of the court explains the ground of its dismissal, upon the motion of Mr. Coxe . Order . 3 This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Dis
More

50 U.S. 602

9 How. 602

13 L. Ed. 276

SMITH HOGAN, ARTHUR S. HOGAN, AND RICHARD Y. REYNOLDS,
PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
AARON ROSS, WHO SUES FOR THE USE OF ROBERT PATTERSON.

January Term, 1850

1

THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi.

2

The order of the court explains the ground of its dismissal, upon the motion of Mr. Coxe.

Order.

3

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and on the motion of Richard S. Coxe, Esquire, of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer