Ex Parte De Groot, (1868)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number:
Visitors: 9
Judges: Nelson
Filed: Mar. 30, 1868
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 73 U.S. 497 (_) 6 Wall. 497 EX PARTE DE GROOT. Supreme Court of United States. Mr. Brent, for the petitioner. Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court. The party has mistaken his remedy, if he has any, which is by writ of error to the court below to reverse the judgment there rendered in the case. The authorities are uniform on the question. [*] NOTES [*] Decatur v. Paulding, 14 Peters, 497; Kendall v. United States, 12 Id. 527; Brashear v. Mason, 6 Howard, 92; The United States v.
Summary: 73 U.S. 497 (_) 6 Wall. 497 EX PARTE DE GROOT. Supreme Court of United States. Mr. Brent, for the petitioner. Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court. The party has mistaken his remedy, if he has any, which is by writ of error to the court below to reverse the judgment there rendered in the case. The authorities are uniform on the question. [*] NOTES [*] Decatur v. Paulding, 14 Peters, 497; Kendall v. United States, 12 Id. 527; Brashear v. Mason, 6 Howard, 92; The United States v. G..
More
73 U.S. 497 (____)
6 Wall. 497
EX PARTE DE GROOT.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. Brent, for the petitioner.
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.
The party has mistaken his remedy, if he has any, which is by writ of error to the court below to reverse the judgment there rendered in the case. The authorities are uniform on the question.[*]
NOTES
[*] Decatur v. Paulding, 14 Peters, 497; Kendall v. United States, 12 Id. 527; Brashear v. Mason, 6 Howard, 92; The United States v. Guthrie, 17 Id. 284.
Source: CourtListener
