Glen v. Fant, (1888)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number:
Visitors: 1
Judges: Waite
Filed: Jan. 09, 1888
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 124 U.S. 123 (1888) GLEN v. FANT. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 4, 1888. Decided January 9, 1888. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Mr. Henry Wise Garnett for the motion. *124 Mr. Martin F. Morris, opposing. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court. This motion is denied. While the stipulation binds the parties to submit the cause without oral argument, there is nothing which requires this to be done at any particular time. Its terms wi
Summary: 124 U.S. 123 (1888) GLEN v. FANT. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 4, 1888. Decided January 9, 1888. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Mr. Henry Wise Garnett for the motion. *124 Mr. Martin F. Morris, opposing. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court. This motion is denied. While the stipulation binds the parties to submit the cause without oral argument, there is nothing which requires this to be done at any particular time. Its terms wil..
More
124 U.S. 123 (1888)
GLEN
v.
FANT.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted January 4, 1888.
Decided January 9, 1888.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Mr. Henry Wise Garnett for the motion.
Mr. Martin F. Morris, opposing.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.
This motion is denied. While the stipulation binds the parties to submit the cause without oral argument, there is nothing which requires this to be done at any particular time. Its terms will be fulfilled if the submission is made when the case is reached in its order. As no reference is made to Rule 20, we cannot apply that rule to the case on the suggestion of one of the parties against the protest of the other.
Denied.
Source: CourtListener
