Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Neel v. Pennsylvania Co., 188 (1895)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 188 Visitors: 37
Judges: The Chief Justice Stated the Case
Filed: Mar. 11, 1895
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 157 U.S. 153 (1895) NEEL v. PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY. No. 188. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 28, 1895. Decided March 11, 1895. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. *154 Mr. Darius Dirlam for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. THE CHIEF JUSTICE stated the case, and said: On the authority of Grace v. American Central Insurance Co., 109 U.S. 278 , 283, 284; Continental Insurance Co. v. Rhoads, 119 U.S. 237 ; and Ma
More
157 U.S. 153 (1895)

NEEL
v.
PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY.

No. 188.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted January 28, 1895.
Decided March 11, 1895.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

*154 Mr. Darius Dirlam for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE stated the case, and said:

On the authority of Grace v. American Central Insurance Co., 109 U.S. 278, 283, 284; Continental Insurance Co. v. Rhoads, 119 U.S. 237; and Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway v. Swan, 111 U.S. 379, 388, the judgment of the Circuit Court will be reversed, with instructions to remand the case to the state court with costs against defendant in error, which must also pay the costs in this court. Hanrick v. Hanrick, 153 U.S. 192, 198.

Judgment reversed accordingly.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer