Judges: The Chief Justice:
Filed: Nov. 30, 1896
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 164 U.S. 281 (1896) NATIONAL ACCIDENT SOCIETY v. SPIRO. No. 460. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted April 27, 1896. Decided November 30, 1896. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Mr. H.D. McBurney for plaintiff in error. Mr. Henry H. Ingersoll for defendant in error. THE CHIEF JUSTICE: This is a certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, propounding, after a preliminary statement, the following question: "Does a defendant by filin
Summary: 164 U.S. 281 (1896) NATIONAL ACCIDENT SOCIETY v. SPIRO. No. 460. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted April 27, 1896. Decided November 30, 1896. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Mr. H.D. McBurney for plaintiff in error. Mr. Henry H. Ingersoll for defendant in error. THE CHIEF JUSTICE: This is a certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, propounding, after a preliminary statement, the following question: "Does a defendant by filing..
More
164 U.S. 281 (1896)
NATIONAL ACCIDENT SOCIETY
v.
SPIRO.
No. 460.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted April 27, 1896.
Decided November 30, 1896.
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
Mr. H.D. McBurney for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Henry H. Ingersoll for defendant in error.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE:
This is a certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, propounding, after a preliminary statement, the following question:
"Does a defendant by filing a petition in a state court for removal of the cause to the United States court, in general terms, unaccompanied by a plea in abatement, and without specifying or restricting the purpose of his appearance, thereby waive objection to the jurisdiction of the court for want of sufficient service of the summons?"
For the reasons given and on the authorities cited in the case of Wabash Western Railway v. Brow, ante, 271, the question must be answered in the negative.
Certificate accordingly.
MR. JUSTICE BREWER and MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM dissented.
