Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Union Pac. Ry. Co. Same v. St. Paul & S. C. R. Co., Nos. 319, 322 (1897)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: Nos. 319, 322 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 15, 1897
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 165 U.S. 482 17 S. Ct. 1001 41 L. Ed. 797 UNITED STATES v. UNION PAC. RY. CO. et al. SAME v. ST. PAUL & S. C. R. CO. et al. Nos. 319, 322. February 15, 1897. Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the opinion of the court. 1 The facts in these cases are different from the facts in the case just decided. U. S. v. Winona & St. P. R. Co., 17 Sup. Ct. 368. But the principles announced in the foregoing opinion are conclusive of the rights of the parties herein, and so, without any statement in detail of the fa
More

165 U.S. 482

17 S. Ct. 1001

41 L. Ed. 797

UNITED STATES
v.
UNION PAC. RY. CO. et al. SAME v. ST. PAUL & S. C. R. CO. et al.

Nos. 319, 322.

February 15, 1897.

Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the opinion of the court.

1

The facts in these cases are different from the facts in the case just decided. U. S. v. Winona & St. P. R. Co., 17 Sup. Ct. 368. But the principles announced in the foregoing opinion are conclusive of the rights of the parties herein, and so, without any statement in detail of the facts, and for the reasons given in that opinion, the decrees in these cases will be affirmed.

2

Sol. Gen. Conrad, for the United States.

3

Thomas Wilson, for appellees St. Paul & S. C. R. Co. et al.

4

John F. Dillon, for appellees Union Pac. Ry. Co. et al.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer