Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

METROPOLITAN RAILWAY COMPANY v. Church, Nos. 114 and 195 (1899)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: Nos. 114 and 195 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 11, 1899
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 174 U.S. 46 (_) METROPOLITAN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CHURCH. BRIGHTWOOD RAILWAY COMPANY v. O'NEAL. Nos. 114, 195. Supreme Court of United States. Mr. D.W. Baker for Metropolitan Railway Co. Mr. Nathaniel Wilson was on his brief. Mr. Ernest L. Schmidt for Church. Mr. Henry P. Blair and Mr. Corcoran Thom, for Brightwood Railway Co., submitted on their brief. Mr. Raymond A. Heiskell and Mr. M.J. Colbert for O'Neal. Argued at the same time, the judgments of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbi
More
174 U.S. 46 (____)

METROPOLITAN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
CHURCH.
BRIGHTWOOD RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
O'NEAL.

Nos. 114, 195.

Supreme Court of United States.

Mr. D.W. Baker for Metropolitan Railway Co. Mr. Nathaniel Wilson was on his brief.

Mr. Ernest L. Schmidt for Church.

Mr. Henry P. Blair and Mr. Corcoran Thom, for Brightwood Railway Co., submitted on their brief.

Mr. Raymond A. Heiskell and Mr. M.J. Colbert for O'Neal.

Argued at the same time, the judgments of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, quashing writs of certiorari to set aside proceedings of a justice of the peace under similar circumstances, are likewise

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer