Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wormley v. District of Columbia, 101, 102 (1901)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 101, 102 Visitors: 24
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Apr. 29, 1901
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2017
Summary: 181 U.S. 402 (1901) WORMLEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ALLEN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 101, 102. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 12, 1900. Decided April 29, 1901. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Mr. D.W. Baker, Mr. John C. Gittings and Mr. Malcom Hufty for plaintiff in error. Mr. Andrew B. Duvall and Mr. Clarence A. Brandenburg for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. And now, April 29, 1901, the judgments in the foregoing cases are affirmed, with costs
More
181 U.S. 402 (1901)

WORMLEY
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
ALLEN
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Nos. 101, 102.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted November 12, 1900.
Decided April 29, 1901.
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Mr. D.W. Baker, Mr. John C. Gittings and Mr. Malcom Hufty for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Andrew B. Duvall and Mr. Clarence A. Brandenburg for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

And now, April 29, 1901, the judgments in the foregoing cases are affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Parsons v. District of Columbia, 170 U.S. 45, and French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., ante, 324.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer