Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank, 3r (1902)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 3r Visitors: 15
Judges: The Chief Justice. This is an Application for Leave to Prosecute a Writ of Error to a State Court
Filed: Jun. 02, 1902
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 186 U.S. 177 (1902) GALLAWAY v. FORT WORTH BANK. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted May 19, 1902. Decided June 2, 1902. MOTION TO SUE OUT WRIT OF ERROR, WITHOUT GIVING BOND REQUIRED BY LAW. Mr. A. Gallaway in propria persona. No appearance opposing. THE CHIEF JUSTICE. This is an application for leave to prosecute a writ of error to a state court, without giving security *178 as required by section 1000 of the Revised Statutes, under an act of Congress of July 20, 1892. 27 Stat. 252. The m
More
186 U.S. 177 (1902)

GALLAWAY
v.
FORT WORTH BANK.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted May 19, 1902.
Decided June 2, 1902.
MOTION TO SUE OUT WRIT OF ERROR, WITHOUT GIVING BOND REQUIRED BY LAW.

Mr. A. Gallaway in propria persona.

No appearance opposing.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE. This is an application for leave to prosecute a writ of error to a state court, without giving security *178 as required by section 1000 of the Revised Statutes, under an act of Congress of July 20, 1892. 27 Stat. 252.

The motion must be denied. Our ruling has uniformly been, and has been enforced in repeated instances that that act has no application to proceedings in this court.

Motion denied.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer