Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. SOUTHERN RY. NEWS, 165 (1909)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 165
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 26, 1909
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 214 U.S. 498 (1909) FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY NEWS COMPANY. No. 165. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 20, 1909. Decided April 26, 1909. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. Mr. William H. Field for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles F. Taylor for defendant in error. *499 Per Curiam: Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U.S. 103 ; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180 ; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U.S
Summary: 214 U.S. 498 (1909) FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY NEWS COMPANY. No. 165. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 20, 1909. Decided April 26, 1909. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. Mr. William H. Field for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles F. Taylor for defendant in error. *499 Per Curiam: Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U.S. 103 ; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180 ; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U.S...
More
214 U.S. 498 (1909)
FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK
v.
SOUTHERN RAILWAY NEWS COMPANY.
No. 165.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 20, 1909.
Decided April 26, 1909.
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.
Mr. William H. Field for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Charles F. Taylor for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:
Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U.S. 103; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U.S. 207; Burt v. Smith, 203 U.S. 135; Barrington v. Missouri, 205 U.S. 485; Tracy v. Ginzberg, 205 U.S. 170; Thompson v. Kentucky, 209 U.S. 430.
Source: CourtListener
