Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mrs. Emma G. Mills, and Her Husband, Harry Mills, in Error v. Mrs. M. E. v. Johnson and Husband, L. A. Johnson, J. H. H. Burk, at Al, 36 (1909)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 36 Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 13, 1909
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 215 U.S. 590 30 S. Ct. 407 54 L. Ed. 340 MRS. EMMA G. MILLS, and her husband, Harry Mills, Plaintiffs in Error, v. MRS. M. E. V. JOHNSON and husband, L. A. Johnson, J. H. H. Burk, at al. No. 36. Supreme Court of the United States December 13, 1909 Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and R. S. Neblett for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Richard Mays, Robert E. Prince, and W. S. Simpkins for defendants in error. Per Curiam: 1 Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Beale v. Johnson, 45 Tex. Civ. A
More

215 U.S. 590

30 S. Ct. 407

54 L. Ed. 340

MRS. EMMA G. MILLS, and her husband, Harry Mills, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MRS. M. E. V. JOHNSON and husband, L. A. Johnson, J. H. H. Burk, at al.

No. 36.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 13, 1909

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and R. S. Neblett for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Richard Mays, Robert E. Prince, and W. S. Simpkins for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

1

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Beale v. Johnson, 45 Tex. Civ. App. 119, 99 S.W. 1045; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 86, 53 L. ed. 417, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220; Waters Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 112, 53 L. ed. 431, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U.S. 432, 53 L. ed. 269, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; Cox v. Texas, 202 U.S. 446, 50 L. ed. 1099, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 671; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U.S. 78, 49 L. ed. 394, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 176; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U.S. 405, 48 L. ed. 239, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer