Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Standard Pipe Line Company, Inc. v. Commissioners of Index Sulphur Drainage District, 11 (1928)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 11 Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 15, 1928
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 278 U.S. 558 49 S. Ct. 17 73 L. Ed. 504 STANDARD PIPE LINE COMPANY, Inc., et al., petitioners, v. COMMISSIONERS OF INDEX SULPHUR DRAINAGE DISTRICT. No. 11. Supreme Court of the United States October 15, 1928 Messrs. T. M. Milling, of Shreveport, La., and William H. Arnold, William H. Arnold, Jr., and David C. Arnold, all of Texarkana, Ark., for petitioner. Mr. Henry Moore, Jr., of Texarkana, Ark., for respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 The writ of certiorari ( 48 S. Ct. 420 ) is dismissed for the reason
More

278 U.S. 558

49 S. Ct. 17

73 L. Ed. 504

STANDARD PIPE LINE COMPANY, Inc., et al., petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONERS OF INDEX SULPHUR DRAINAGE DISTRICT.

No. 11.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 15, 1928

Messrs. T. M. Milling, of Shreveport, La., and William H. Arnold, William H. Arnold, Jr., and David C. Arnold, all of Texarkana, Ark., for petitioner.

Mr. Henry Moore, Jr., of Texarkana, Ark., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

1

The writ of certiorari (48 S. Ct. 420) is dismissed for the reason that the decree of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Ct. 264, 62 L. Ed. 701; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U.S. 268, 271, 39 S. Ct. 111, 63 L. Ed. 233.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer