Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sackett v. Lynch, 814 (1934)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 814 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 19, 1934
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 291 U.S. 652 54 S. Ct. 563 78 L. Ed. 1046 The PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, on the relation of Harry P. SACKETT, appellant, v. Thomas M. LYNCH et al., constituting the State Tax Commission of the State of New York. * No. 814. Supreme Court of the United States March 19, 1934 Messrs. Jerome A. Weiss, of Brooklyn, N. Y., and Wm. F. Unger, of New York City, for appellants. Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Atty. Gen., Henry Epstein, of New York City, and Joseph M. Mesnig, of Albany, N. Y., for appel
More

291 U.S. 652

54 S. Ct. 563

78 L. Ed. 1046

The PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, on the relation of Harry P. SACKETT, appellant,
v.
Thomas M. LYNCH et al., constituting the State Tax Commission of the State of New York.*

No. 814.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 1934

Messrs. Jerome A. Weiss, of Brooklyn, N. Y., and Wm. F. Unger, of New York City, for appellants.

Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Atty. Gen., Henry Epstein, of New York City, and Joseph M. Mesnig, of Albany, N. Y., for appellees.

For opinion below, see 263 N.Y. 568, 189 N.E. 701.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question, kipley v. Illinois, 170 U.S. 182, 186, 187, 18 S. Ct. 550, 42 L. Ed. 998; Layton v. Missouri, 187 U.S. 356, 358, 23 S. Ct. 137, 47 L. Ed. 214; Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U.S. 133, 135, 23 S. Ct. 48, 47 L. Ed. 106; Saltonstall v. Saltonstall, 276 U.S. 260, 267, 268, 48 S. Ct. 225, 72 L. Ed. 565.

*

Rehearing denied 292 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 713, 78 L. Ed. —-.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer