Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo, 411 (1937)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 411 Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 25, 1937
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 302 U.S. 736 58 S. Ct. 122 82 L. Ed. 569 ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, et al., petitioners, v. Frank A. CARDILLO, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission and James S. Rennie. * No. 411. Supreme Court of the United States October 25, 1937 Messrs. Norman B. Frost, Frank H. Myers ad Frederic N. Towers, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioners. 1 Mr. James E. McCabe, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Rennie. 2 Messrs. Stanley Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington
More

302 U.S. 736

58 S. Ct. 122

82 L. Ed. 569

ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, et al., petitioners,
v.
Frank A. CARDILLO, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission and James S. Rennie.*

No. 411.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 25, 1937

Messrs. Norman B. Frost, Frank H. Myers ad Frederic N. Towers, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

1

Mr. James E. McCabe, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Rennie.

2

Messrs. Stanley Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Sam E. Whitaker, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Henry A. Julicher, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Frank A. Cardillo.

3

For opinion below, see Hoage v. Royal Ind. Co., 67 App.D.C. 142, 90 F.(2d) 387.

4

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

*

Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 778, 58 S. Ct. 270, 82 L.Ed. ——.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer