Landman v. Miedzinski, 589 (1959)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 589
Visitors: 13
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Feb. 24, 1959
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: 358 U.S. 644 (1959) LANDMAN ET AL. v. MIEDZINSKI, SHERIFF, ET AL. No. 589. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 24, 1959. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. F. Joseph Donohue and Harold C. Faulkner for appellants. C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, Stedman Prescott, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and James H. Norris, Jr. for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
358 U.S. 644 (1959)
LANDMAN ET AL.
v.
MIEDZINSKI, SHERIFF, ET AL.
No. 589.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided February 24, 1959.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
F. Joseph Donohue and Harold C. Faulkner for appellants.
C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, Stedman Prescott, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and James H. Norris, Jr. for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Source: CourtListener
