Camara v. United States, 605 M (1960)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 605 M
Visitors: 31
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 27, 1960
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 364 U.S. 283 (1960) CAMARA v. UNITED STATES. No. 605, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 27, 1960. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Elkins
Summary: 364 U.S. 283 (1960) CAMARA v. UNITED STATES. No. 605, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 27, 1960. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Elkins v..
More
364 U.S. 283 (1960)
CAMARA
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 605, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 27, 1960.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 206, decided this day.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER dissents on the basis of his dissenting opinion in Rios v. United States, ante, p. 233, and Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 233, decided this day.
Source: CourtListener
