Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co., 241 (1961)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 241 Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 09, 1961
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 368 U.S. 813 82 S. Ct. 56 7 L. Ed. 2d 22 SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. et al. No. 241. Supreme Court of the United States October 9, 1961 Ross C. Fisher and Herman F. Selvin, for petitioners. William C. Dixon, for respondents. 1 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition which reads as follows: 2 '1. Where a group of citrus fruit growers f
More

368 U.S. 813

82 S. Ct. 56

7 L. Ed. 2d 22

SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., et al., petitioners,
v.
WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. et al.

No. 241.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 9, 1961

Ross C. Fisher and Herman F. Selvin, for petitioners.

William C. Dixon, for respondents.

1

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition which reads as follows:

2

'1. Where a group of citrus fruit growers form a cooperative organization for the purpose of collectively processing and marketing their fruit, and carry out those functions through the agency of three co-operative agricultural associations, each of which is basically wholly owned and governed by those growers, and each of which is admittedly entitled to the exemption from the antitrust laws accorded to agricultural cooperatives by the Capper-Volstead Act (7 U.S.C.A., sec. 291)—is an unlawful conspiracy, combination or agreement established under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2] upon proof only that these growers, through the agency of these three cooperatives, agreed among only themselves with respect to the extent of the division of the function of processing between them or with respect to the price they would charge in the open market for the fruit and the by-products thereof processed and marketed by them?'

3

The case is transferred to the summary calendar.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer