Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Adolph Hohensee v. New Syndicate, Inc., Etc, 214 (1962)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 214 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 11, 1962
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 369 U.S. 659 82 S. Ct. 1035 8 L. Ed. 2d 273 Adolph HOHENSEE v. NEW SYNDICATE, INC., etc. No. 214. Supreme Court of the United States May 14, 1962 Rehearing Denied June 11, 1962. See 370 U.S. 920 , 82 S. Ct. 1552 . James C. Newton, for petitioner. Stuart N. Updike, for respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. PER CURIAM. 1 The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consider
More

369 U.S. 659

82 S. Ct. 1035

8 L. Ed. 2d 273

Adolph HOHENSEE
v.
NEW SYNDICATE, INC., etc.

No. 214.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 1962

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1962.

See 370 U.S. 920, 82 S. Ct. 1552.

James C. Newton, for petitioner.

Stuart N. Updike, for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

1

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, 369 U.S. 463, 82 S. Ct. 913, 8 L. Ed. 2d 39.

2

Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari.

3

Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer