Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 10, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 374 U.S. 97 (1963) RANDOLPH ET AL. v. VIRGINIA. No. 20. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 10, 1963. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Martin A. Martin, Clarence W. Newsome, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, and Charles L. Black, Jr. for petitioners. Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments
Summary: 374 U.S. 97 (1963) RANDOLPH ET AL. v. VIRGINIA. No. 20. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 10, 1963. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Martin A. Martin, Clarence W. Newsome, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, and Charles L. Black, Jr. for petitioners. Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments ..
More
374 U.S. 97 (1963)
RANDOLPH ET AL.
v.
VIRGINIA.
No. 20.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 10, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
Martin A. Martin, Clarence W. Newsome, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, and Charles L. Black, Jr. for petitioners.
Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U. S., at 248.
