Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Maintenance Employes v. United States, 510 (1963)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 510 Visitors: 16
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Dec. 09, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 375 U.S. 216 (1963) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. No. 510. Supreme Court of United States. Decided December 9, 1963. [*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Clarence M. Mulholland, Richard R. Lyman, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., William G. Mahoney and Harry A. Carson for appellants in No. 510. Charles S. Rhyne, Edward D. Means, Jr. and Alfred J. Tighe for appellants in No. 511. Solicitor General Cox for the Unit
More
375 U.S. 216 (1963)

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

No. 510.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 9, 1963.[*]
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.

Clarence M. Mulholland, Richard R. Lyman, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., William G. Mahoney and Harry A. Carson for appellants in No. 510. Charles S. Rhyne, Edward D. Means, Jr. and Alfred J. Tighe for appellants in No. 511.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Edward K. Wheeler, Hewitt S. Biaett, Robert G. Seaks and Kenneth H. Ekin for appellee carriers.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

NOTES

[*] Together with No. 511, Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same Court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer