Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Smith v. California, 72 (1963)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 72 Visitors: 36
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Dec. 16, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 375 U.S. 259 (1963) SMITH v. CALIFORNIA. No. 72. Supreme Court of United States. Decided December 16, 1963. CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for petitioner. Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for respondent. Charles H. Keating, Jr. for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion of Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., e
More
375 U.S. 259 (1963)

SMITH
v.
CALIFORNIA.

No. 72.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 16, 1963.
CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.

Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for petitioner.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for respondent.

Charles H. Keating, Jr. for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for further consideration in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of California in Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal. 2d 901, 383 P.2d 152.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer