Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Head v. California, 872, Misc (1963)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 872, Misc Visitors: 5
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 17, 1963
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 374 U.S. 509 (1963) HEAD v. CALIFORNIA. No. 872, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 17, 1963. ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and A. Wallace Tashima, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted but the motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Trea
More
374 U.S. 509 (1963)

HEAD
v.
CALIFORNIA.

No. 872, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 17, 1963.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and A. Wallace Tashima, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted but the motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer