Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pedro Camacho Lopez v. Texas, 396, Misc (1964)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 396, Misc Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 12, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 378 U.S. 567 84 S. Ct. 1924 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038 Pedro Camacho LOPEZ v. TEXAS. No. 396, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States June 22, 1964 Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 1964. See 85 S. Ct. 21 . Carlos C. Cadena, for petitioner. Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, and James E. Barlow, for respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The j
More

378 U.S. 567

84 S. Ct. 1924

12 L. Ed. 2d 1038

Pedro Camacho LOPEZ
v.
TEXAS.

No. 396, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 22, 1964

Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 1964.

See 85 S. Ct. 21.

Carlos C. Cadena, for petitioner.

Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, and James E. Barlow, for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S. Ct. 1774.

2

Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer