McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Bd., 472 (1964)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 472
Visitors: 5
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Dec. 07, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 379 U.S. 133 (1964) McCULLOCH v. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD. No. 472. Supreme Court of United States. Decided November 23, 1964. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. Walter L. Nossaman for appellant. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and Harry W. Low, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
379 U.S. 133 (1964)
McCULLOCH
v.
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD.
No. 472.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided November 23, 1964.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
Walter L. Nossaman for appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and Harry W. Low, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Source: CourtListener
