Telephone News System, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., 772 (1964)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 772
Visitors: 22
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Apr. 06, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 376 U.S. 782 (1964) TELEPHONE NEWS SYSTEM, INC., v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL. No. 772. Supreme Court of United States. Decided April 6, 1964. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Thomas D. Nash, Jr. for appellant. Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and Walter J. Cummings, Jr. for Illinois Bell Telephone Co., appellees. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be
Summary: 376 U.S. 782 (1964) TELEPHONE NEWS SYSTEM, INC., v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL. No. 772. Supreme Court of United States. Decided April 6, 1964. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Thomas D. Nash, Jr. for appellant. Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and Walter J. Cummings, Jr. for Illinois Bell Telephone Co., appellees. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be n..
More
376 U.S. 782 (1964)
TELEPHONE NEWS SYSTEM, INC.,
v.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.
No. 772.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided April 6, 1964.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
Thomas D. Nash, Jr. for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and Walter J. Cummings, Jr. for Illinois Bell Telephone Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Source: CourtListener
