Del Hoyo v. New York, 893, Misc (1964)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 893, Misc
Visitors: 4
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 22, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 378 U.S. 570 (1964) DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK. No. 893, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 22, 1964. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. Leon B. Polsky and Edward A. Miller for petitioner. Isidore Dollinger and Irving Anolik for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supre
Summary: 378 U.S. 570 (1964) DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK. No. 893, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 22, 1964. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. Leon B. Polsky and Edward A. Miller for petitioner. Isidore Dollinger and Irving Anolik for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Suprem..
More
378 U.S. 570 (1964)
DEL HOYO
v.
NEW YORK.
No. 893, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT.
Leon B. Polsky and Edward A. Miller for petitioner.
Isidore Dollinger and Irving Anolik for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
Source: CourtListener
