Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for Cal. v. Ammex Warehouse Co. of San Ysidro, 919 (1964)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 919 Visitors: 16
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 15, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 378 U.S. 124 (1964) DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. AMMEX WAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., ET AL. No. 919. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 15, 1964. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, E. G. Funke, Assistant Attorney General and Felice R. Cutter and Warren H. Deering, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants. George D. Byfield for appellees. PER CURIAM.
More
378 U.S. 124 (1964)

DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR CALIFORNIA ET AL.
v.
AMMEX WAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., ET AL.

No. 919.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 15, 1964.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, E. G. Funke, Assistant Attorney General and Felice R. Cutter and Warren H. Deering, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants.

George D. Byfield for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer