Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lynchburg Traffic Bureau v. United States, 931 (1964)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 931 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 22, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 377 U.S. 270 84 S. Ct. 1348 12 L. Ed. 2d 305 LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 931. Supreme Court of the United States May 25, 1964 Rehearing Denied June 22, 1964. See 84 S. Ct. 1911 . W. G. Burnette, for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss, for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission. Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Robert B. Claytor and John W. Hanifin, for
More

377 U.S. 270

84 S. Ct. 1348

12 L. Ed. 2d 305

LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU
v.
UNITED STATES et al.

No. 931.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 25, 1964

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1964.

See 84 S. Ct. 1911.

W. G. Burnette, for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss, for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Robert B. Claytor and John W. Hanifin, for rail appellees.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer