Catanzaro v. New York, 994, Misc (1964)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 994, Misc
Visitors: 3
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 22, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 378 U.S. 573 (1964) CATANZARO v. NEW YORK. No. 994, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 22, 1964. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. Petitioner pro se. Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals of New York is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent
Summary: 378 U.S. 573 (1964) CATANZARO v. NEW YORK. No. 994, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 22, 1964. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. Petitioner pro se. Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals of New York is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent ..
More
378 U.S. 573 (1964)
CATANZARO
v.
NEW YORK.
No. 994, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
Petitioner pro se.
Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals of New York is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
Source: CourtListener
