Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. First National City Bank, 998 (1964)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 998 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 01, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 377 U.S. 951 84 S. Ct. 1629 12 L. Ed. 2d 496 UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. No. 998. Supreme Court of the United States June 1, 1964 Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States. Henry Harfield, for respondent. 1 Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae. 2 Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F. Supp. 773 ; 321 F.2d 14 ; 325 F.2d 1020 . 3 Petition for writ of certiora
More

377 U.S. 951

84 S. Ct. 1629

12 L. Ed. 2d 496

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.

No. 998.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 1, 1964

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.

Henry Harfield, for respondent.

1

Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.

2

Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F. Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.

3

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer