Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Fox v. United States, 987 (1965)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 987 Visitors: 42
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 01, 1965
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2017
Summary: 381 U.S. 436 (1965) MOTOR CONVOY, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. No. 987. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 1, 1965. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Paul M. Daniell, Robert E. Born and Martin Sack for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; George S. Dixon for National Automobile Transporters Association; and Ne
More
381 U.S. 436 (1965)

MOTOR CONVOY, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

No. 987.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 1, 1965.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA.

Paul M. Daniell, Robert E. Born and Martin Sack for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; George S. Dixon for National Automobile Transporters Association; and Nelson M. Harris, Jr., for Dixie Transport Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer